In conclusion, I quote one last fact. In my state, it goes through a major economic crisis, spendin

Never communed with anarchist ideas, but seeing what is happening in Brazil turned perennial flowers my attention to them, I wanted to know why some revolted against this code we call laws. Anarchists are radical: preach the end of the State; say it is harmful and unnecessary one, used preferably to favor the ruling classes. More: are convinced that the community should come together to make decisions perennial flowers in your best interest, regardless of such laws, but make it clear that anarchism means absence of coercion and not absence of order.
It is difficult for anyone to agree to ideas that preach the end of the state and the lack of a legal system, but I am convinced that something needs to be changed. I have the impression that, in our country, were not the men who created the laws, were laws that created perennial flowers men ... Our laws give me the impression of having its own life; besides govern us seem to mock us. They are worshiped with fervor. Whenever absurdities are committed in their name immediately appear their priests - known by jurists - to say what the law is harsh but it is the law. Looking at this kind of behavior, understand anarchists.
Examples abound to talk about Brazilian laws. I'll start by actually happened recently. A newspaper reported with alarm that seven out of 10 inmates in the PF operations in Rio Grande do Sul are released this year. The report said "the formidable wealth of documentary evidence, phone records, videos and witnesses used does not mean right to the target chain of actions." They say one of the emblematic cases of mismatch between perennial flowers the will to arrest and the decision to release was the "Operation Heritage," perennial flowers which resulted in 77 people arrested for alleged involvement in robberies and car cloning - all were released within a month.
The newspaper interviewed the judge who ordered release prisoners. The same was asked the reason for the release of offenders. He said it has not verified the personal condition of each of the detainees before deciding. It was not his role, he said. Added saying that this should be based on order of remand issued by the trial judge. The journalist perennial flowers insisted: "The arrest of the suspects was determined by the judge based on 150 sheets of PF report. Did not you read this report before releasing the prisoners? He mentions that a colleague perennial flowers of his, a judge, was beaten by thieves ... ". He replied that he did not examine evidence to grant a writ of habeas corpus. That its function was to see if there is need to keep the suspect arrested.
Judicial decisions should not be criticized, but it is impossible to miss: it's a lot of law is much argument for as little punishment. It's a lot of people go unpunished. Last year I felt it in his own flesh: I was mugged and got shot in the face. The assailant was underage. Arrested, the "boy" is protected by the Statute of Children and Adolescents and can only be reached by a "socio-educational" measure, at most, three years. How to admit that treatment for cold and inhuman killers. perennial flowers How can treat them with as much gentleness as their victims carry consequences for the rest of their lives. This law needs to be discussed by society to bankroll this whole apparatus. "Boys" who drive cars, vote, and so are the parents need to be held accountable with real feathers.
We can not forget the politicians. Some do everything perennial flowers that is absurd perennial flowers when they are exercising their warrants. Under a public outcry, resign, admit the shenanigans and turn away to avoid being punished - the law allows! In the first election looming, there they are again. A people without memory elects and soon reassume their positions. Just one question! Just one question! Why the candidacy of people perennial flowers who waives a mandate that made it clear he no longer wanted public office is not prohibited? Only the left accept, tolerate their presence and continue bankrolling their wages paying taxes on time. Is the law is immoral - but it is the law.
In conclusion, I quote one last fact. In my state, it goes through a major economic crisis, spending more than it collects, there is a great public debate. The existence of multiple perennial flowers servers earning higher wages than the ceiling was detected. One of them would be earning forty three thousand reais a month. The Secretary of Finance announced the Government's intention to cut the surplus of all. The head of one of the affected sectors jumped logo: "I will not allow, everything is within the law and will not accept cuts." She added saying that the secretary does not have the authority to think - "is a simple secretary" ... I go back to the beginning - the law, it again! It relied on wages for taxpayers to bear out the reality and everything that goes against common sense. Imagine perennial flowers the scene: someone looking a paycheck with forty three thousand REAI